“When I feel uncertain, I am more likely to trust guidance from AI systems.”
Complete the assessment to place your responses inside the data—against all participants, people of a similar age and people who use AI as often as you do.
AI use can feel normal simply because it is familiar. What you cannot see is how your behaviour compares with anyone else.
Your responses are compared with benchmark data drawn from more than 10,500 research participants across 21 HCI studies.
“When I feel uncertain, I am more likely to trust guidance from AI systems.”
Complete the assessment to place your responses inside the data—against all participants, people of a similar age and people who use AI as often as you do.
HCI data has been used for external validation in peer-reviewed AI research. Benchmark methodology published in full
Frequency tells you how often AI is present. Behaviour tells you what role it is playing.
Yes. The HCI AI Identity & Behaviour Assessment is a 39-question, non-clinical assessment that compares reported AI-use behaviour with HCI participant benchmarks overall, within an age group and, where sufficient data is available, among people who use AI at a similar frequency.
It is a 39-question, non-clinical self-report assessment that compares a person’s reported AI-use behaviour with HCI participant benchmarks across nine dimensions.
It is designed for adults who use AI for work, study, research, creativity, decisions or everyday tasks and want to understand how their behaviour compares with other participants.
In this example, an answer of 5 is a higher response than 80 out of 100 HCI participants. This is one of 39 responses used to build a wider behavioural profile.
“I often rely on AI even when I could work things out on my own.”
Response distribution across all HCI participants.
Current question benchmark: 351 valid responses. Percentages are rounded.
The question is no longer only what AI can do. It is also what role you want it to play in the way you think, decide and create.
In Anthropic’s 2026 public survey of nearly 52,000 Americans, cognitive dependency was the second-most commonly cited AI fear. Anthropic Public Record, 2026.
How often you use AI is only one part of the picture. Your results examine the relationships between how you think, trust, verify and decide.
See which parts of your pattern are typical among similar users—and which genuinely stand apart.
See whether AI is helping you develop and challenge ideas, or increasingly providing their starting structure and direction.
See how trust and verification work together—and how often AI outputs are independently tested.
Distinguish between using AI for input, allowing it to frame your options and retaining ownership of the final judgement.
From benchmark to behaviour
Compare your reported AI behaviour with other participants. Then take a finding to your AI assistant and ask for examples from your conversations that support or challenge it.
Typically under five minutes.
Optional and private. HCI does not receive your conversation history. The final judgement remains yours.
I completed the HCI AI Behaviour Assessment. My results suggest I use AI to confirm what I already think rather than challenge it more often than people who use AI as often as I do.
Can you show me specific examples from our conversations that support or challenge this finding?
HCI compares your self-reported behaviour across nine dimensions with aggregated participant data rather than interpreting each answer in isolation.
Your result creates a dated reference point for how your relationship with AI looks today—one you can return to as your behaviour and the technology change.
It can show how common or uncommon your responses are within HCI benchmark data. “Normal” means typical here — not correct, healthy or desirable.
Free personalised results showing three selected dimensions and three behavioural comparisons against HCI participant benchmarks. An optional expanded analysis is available afterward.
Your responses are compared with aggregated benchmark data from more than 10,500 paid adult research participants recruited through Prolific across 21 HCI studies conducted during 2025–2026.
Where sufficient data is available, selected results also compare you with people of a similar age and people who use AI at a similar frequency.
No. The assessment uses structured behavioural questions. Chat logs, conversation histories and private documents are not required. Discussing findings later with your usual AI assistant is optional.
Yes. You can ask the AI assistant you use most to look for accessible conversation examples that support, challenge or qualify selected findings.
This can make the results easier to examine, but it does not validate your benchmark score and depends on the conversation history the assistant can access.
No. It examines behaviours related to reliance and perceived dependence, but it is not a psychological, medical or mental health assessment, diagnosis or clinical dependence test.
You may be more typical than you think—or your pattern may stand apart in ways that are difficult to recognise from inside your own routine.